Return to the Articles Page Return to The Realm of Ryan 

Raymond Benson’s second James Bond novel follows in the style of his first, Zero Minus Ten, but moves in an even more fantasy-fueled direction. Where his first book feels like an odd alliance of Ian Fleming and the Pierce Brosnan movies, The Facts of Death reads exactly like an unused script for one of the late ‘90s Eon Productions films. Gadgetry is at a premium, the villains are a loony independent terrorist organization based on the standard SPECTRE theme, and the Q Branch scenes are carbon-copies of the usual cinema repartee. Benson makes a number of Fleming references (and even a few to Kingsley Amis’s Colonel Sun) and brings back the popular character Felix Leiter in a major role, but otherwise this is a palimpsest of the film series version of 007 with no excuses. Even John Gardner’s novels, which definitely adhere closer the films, never got more obviously cinematic. Benson, in an interview for CommanderBond.net, admitted as much: “I think The Facts of Death is my most Eon-like novel. I purposefully set out to write something that felt like a Bond movie with that one.”
Is this a good thing or a bad thing? That might depend on your opinion of the Brosnan films, which serve as the model here. The plot never skimps on action, but much of it would work better on movie screens than it does on the printed page. In a book, a simple tense exchange of gunfire can make for electric reading, while an intricate chase with a gadget-laden car that can change colors and launch a drone that drops aerial mines can turn silly and tiresome. Benson plots the story in “location jumps” like the Eon films, such as having Bond engage in a fight in the ruins of the ancient city of
The story is pleasantly fanciful in a popcorn thriller sort of way. A series of murders of British agents in
Against the realistic cyclorama of nationalist hostility over
The book sometimes plummets into silliness, such as the “yuk-yuk” sequence of Bond going to a fertility clinic, getting it on in one of the rooms with the center’s sexy director, and finishing with some predictable puns. Groan. Picturing the grinning teen boys reading this makes it all the more aggravating. In a rare formula departure Bond gets to use his analytical mind for the finale, but the brain-teaser puzzle the villain sets up for him to solve comes from another genre entirely and doesn’t match 007’s capabilities. Again, I have to wonder if Benson was thinking more along the lines of Batman than Bond. And perhaps readers should skip to the very last line of the book and read the awful pun there so they can get the involuntary spasms over with now. It won’t spoil any of the story, honest.
James Bond has a few traces of his Fleming-era melancholy, but unfortunately this all but suffocates under a veneer of Brosnan- and Moore-inspired quips. Bond acts more like a smartass, oversexed teen who gets to carry a gun (please reference the above-mentioned sperm bank scene) than a professionally trained secret agent. John Gardner ignored much of Fleming’s background, but at least his Bond wasn’t mugging for non-existent cameras. This 007 seems painfully aware of being on screen and subsequently plays to the audience.
The strongest parts of the book and the sections where Bond seems most fleshed-out, are his interactions with the current and former ‘M’s, Barbara Mawdsley and Miles Messervy. (The revelation of the current M’s name isn’t canonical with the character in the movies.) Seeing the old battleship Sir Miles return, even if only as a retiree giving avuncular advice to his former top agent, is a thrill. He still has those “damnably clear grey eyes” that Fleming mentioned and which Benson loves to repeat. As for the current M, she gets to stretch beyond the office and turn into more of human being than in the Eon films. Not since Colonel Sun has the non-Fleming M had so much personally at stake in the story. But it fades away in the second half, and her lover’s potentially juicy involvement in the Decada affair vanishes like a whimper.
The girl, Niki Mirakos of Greek intelligence, is physically modeled on Melina Havelock from For Your Eyes Only but stands firmly in the cinematic tradition that pairs Bond with capable and beautiful espionage operatives. Niki is yet another of these super-agent super-models who can hold their own with Bond. The frequent attempts to combat 007’s sexism that started in earnest with The Spy Who Loved Me has turned this character type in a cliché that needs to be put out to pasture for a time, and Niki adds nothing new to the device.
The adversaries have improved over Benson’s last effort. The femme fatale, Hera Voulopoulos, is memorable and instigates a twist conclusion that pushes the story in an unexpected direction. Romanos Konstantine, the “Monad” of Decada, is a slick character in the billionaire-with-a-grudge model. He’s nothing spectacular, but does his job adequately. His requisite card game against 007—a back-to-the-basic baccarat match—is unnecessary and dull, however.
Ultimately, the mild story improvements of The Facts of Death do not carry along the same weak writing style that damaged Zero Minus Ten. Paint-by-number descriptions start most of the chapters. Data gets dropped in chunks where it’s inappropriate. Action are sequences written in colorless play-by-play. Bond is denied an inner-voice or convincing opinions. Put all together, the language is a distinctly charmless reading experience. It lacks joy or decadent pleasure, and in places (such as the sex scenes) turns plain embarrassing. You read a book like this for events, never for the sensation of the words on the page. This flaw continually defeats Benson’s efforts, despite his extensive knowledge of the literary and cinematic James Bond and interesting story ideas. Chalk up The Facts of Death as another casualty of language. Take the cinematic ride, but you’ll be left with popcorn grease all over your fingers and the desire to go read a good book afterwards.